Archive for the ‘sued credit card’ Category

Do Third Party Debt Collectors Often Sue?

Wednesday, December 21st, 2011

Many consumers wonder if they will get sued when dealing with a third party debt collector? This is a valid question due to the fact that there are so many credit card lawsuits going on in general. The fact is that it is rare for a third party debt collector to sue a consumer.

There are a few different reasons for this. First, a third party debt collector will almost never have a signed contract with you (the consumer) and the original creditor. This contract must exist and be signed and dated by all effected parties stating that all three parties are in agreement of the transfer of the debt to the third party debt collector. Without this signed agreement, the third party debt collector will not have a case that will stand up in court.

All that being said, if the consumer begins making payments to the third party debt collector, the debt collector will then make the argument that there was consideration even without a written agreement. This means that your actions show that you agree to make payments to the third party collector that in turn takes the place of the written agreement.

I am sure it makes more sense now why third party debt collectors are always trying so hard to harass consumers to make at least one payment. For the debt collector, this one payment is as good as a written contract!

Creditors on the other hand do have written agreements with almost all consumers they extend credit to. Because creditors have these agreements they are more inclined to sue if the cannot collect on the account in a less costly way.

Both creditors and third party debt collectors will be left with no choice other than to sue if the consumer sends them a cease and desist letter. In my experience I strongly discourage sending letters to cease and desist. They will almost always worsen your situation.

If You Have Credit Card Debt Use The Court System To Your Advantage.

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

Think of a person with $30,000 (5 credit accounts) in credit card or unsecured debt. His debt payments might have tippled in recent months and his interest rate is now much higher than it was, maybe 20% – 30%. No matter what his payments are, or that is, what the creditor says they want every month, there is no law commanding any penalty on him if he basically stops making the payments to his creditors.

If he does zilch, and the most horrible of the worst case scenarios happens, all five creditors sue him and obtain a judgment within 16 months of the first nonpayment. This time period is typical, but the probability that they all would sue him at one time is extremely unlikely, whichever way.

The state statutes impose a legal interest rate attached to judgments of this sort (usually where the contracted interest rate exceeds the state’s legal rate) and that rate is not subject to the “unlimited” rate allowed in the credit agreements these days. It typically ranges from 5% to 12% depending on the state of residence.

If the person did nothing, and these judgments were received and the first judgment creditor completed a writ of continuing wage garnishment, they could get the maximum of 25% after the CCPA exempt amount (Table of Limits) and after tax withholdings; this would preclude all four other creditors from this example from taking any part of his earnings or paycheck.

If the person did nothing, and these judgments were obtained and the first judgment creditor obtained a writ of garnishment, they could get the maximum of 25% after the CCPA exempt amount (Table of Limits) and after tax withholdings; this would preclude all four other creditors from taking any part of his paycheck.

Simply put the monthly payments he was making 16 months ago, about $900 to $1100, at an interest rate of about 25%, could now be $300 through the wage garnishment, at a rate of 12% or under. That’s the refinance, and now he is paying only one creditor at a time instead of all of them at vastly lower rates and lower monthly amounts. He is paying based on his ability to pay and has financial control, and is not paying based on how much the world or the creditors says he owes, thanks to the CCPA.

What Is The Statute Of Limitations For Debts And Judgments?

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

The statute of limitations (“SOL”) for debts is the time limit after the debt occurs for the creditor to file a lawsuit to recover the debt. This period starts when the debtor becomes delinquent. When the SOL has passed on a debt the creditor will still be able to file a lawsuit. However, the defendant will be able to have the case

dismissed because the statute was “blown”. The Statute Of Limitations only covers legal action. The expiration of the limitations period does not affect other types of collection action or reporting to credit bureaus.

In collecting a debt, the creditor may theoretically continue with letters and telephone calls forever. Collection agencies can also keep up with the letters and phone calls, although third-party collectors are subject to the “cease and desist” provision of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Despite this, creditors and collectors rarely put much effort into collecting debts that have passed the statute of limitations. These debts can still be reported to credit bureaus for the time limits specified in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, regardless if they have been disputed legally. Credit cards and other revolving lines are generally considered Open Accounts. Auto loans and other installment agreements are Written Contracts. Promissory notes are usually mortgages, equity lines of credit, and student loans.

For information for reference on the statues of limitation you can check with your local attorney or give us a call. But again, If you actually plan on filing or defending a lawsuit, you should consult your legal counsel.

After a creditor wins a lawsuit against a debtor and is awarded a judgment by the court, there is a time limit for collecting that judgment called the Statute of Limitations (“SOL”). At any time after a lawsuit is won and before the expiration of the SOL, a creditor can collect on an unpaid judgment. However, many states allow judgments to be renewed one or more times, which could substantially extend the enforceability of a judgment, if the creditor is vigilant about the renewals. This can potentially result in a permanent legal obligation until it is paid. Be aware that paying an outstanding judgment can update an account that has long been “written off” by the creditor. Even though the creditor can collect forever, as in Delaware, sometimes it’s best to just let the judgment fall by the wayside, off the creditor’s radar, and eventually…off your credit report. You may want to consult with an attorney or ask us what the statute of limitations, and the allowable interest that can be charged on the judgment for your state is. Even though there is many examples and templates available to you for defending a lawsuit on your own, If you actually plan on filing or defending a lawsuit, you should consult your legal counsel.

 

Audio Subscribe Button

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).